How we prepare and review content
A useful question, original sources and human review before publication.
From idea to publication
- Identify the reader’s question and task.
- Research original sources and record links and verification dates.
- Prepare a draft separately from published content.
- Review facts, wording, limits and examples.
- Obtain Mohamed’s approval before publication.
- Measure use only once real tools are connected, and update information when it changes.
State the review method
“Hands-on tested” requires an actual documented test. A “documentation-based overview” relies on product documentation without claiming that the tool was tested. “General guidance (not tested)” means a method and checklists written from general knowledge and reviewed by a person: not an evaluation and not a test result. Anything about tools that changes is left as questions for you to check at the official source.
Respect the limits of the evidence
Changing prices and capabilities need sources and verification dates. We do not invent traffic, customer opinions or income claims. AI output receives human review and is never published automatically.
Updates and corrections
Articles show publication, update and review dates. Material changes are recorded in the article. Send corrections through the contact page.
Private information
Customer data and account secrets do not belong in content. RICH is separate: its existing public work page remains, while new uses require permission for each case. Other examples use clearly identified public or synthetic data. AI-generated concepts are labelled.